I recently navigated a scenario with our team where a leader admitted that he felt overlooked, unheard, and unappreciated when a key decision was made. This leader wrote a strong email admitting his frustration to one of our staff members and copied me.
Tag: management
Managing Macro: Staying mindful of the big picture
Last week, I wrote here about “managing micro”. This is different than micromanaging, with its negative connotations, and is necessary for organizational success.
Someone has to manage macro
I don’t want to move on without taking an opportunity to insist that it is also required for someone to be “managing macro”.
- Someone has to be looking at the organization from the thirty thousand foot view.
- Someone should be looking ahead to where future energies will need to go.
- Someone should be anticipating where potential obstacles may arise.
- Someone must be looking at the pieces of the organization in the context of the whole.
Who’s looking at the big picture?
There is a classic leader-manager joke:
“What’s the difference between a leader and a manager? A manager makes sure you’re climbing the ladder but a leader makes sure the ladder is on the right wall.”
This joke and others like it undervalue the role of managers. They do provide a good contrast though, for what I am referring to here as the managing macro role.
Usually, the point person or driver for an initiative will be the person managing the higher level pieces. If that’s you, don’t get stuck in the details on your to-do list. Don’t forget to check yourself regularly against your larger purpose and goals.
Someone has to do both
Managing the details and maintaining the big picture are both necessary. Don’t neglect them and don’t let yourself get frozen in one or the other. You may fail to achieve your overall objectives.
Don’t be the boss everyone likes
I have held managerial responsibility for other people since my first job at 16. I’m pretty sure I haven’t always been great at it. One struggle I have had is always wanting my people to like me. This seems like it would be a good thing but I have discovered several reasons over time why I no longer want to be “the boss everyone likes”.
1. Nothing gets done because the boss holds no one accountable to their commitments. No accountability = no results.
2. Bad news is uncomfortable to deliver and to receive. If you can only say what you think people want to hear, you can’t be honest. No honesty = no trust.
3. No decisions are made because inevitably someone disagrees with someone else. No decisions = perpetual stalemate.
4. No conflict is allowed in meetings when the boss is afraid of hurt feelings. No conflict means there is no healthy exchange of ideas, which generally leads to only mediocre ideas getting presented. Everyone can agree on mediocre. People who want better will leave the organization to find a place where conflict promotes improvement.
I still fight the tendency to fall into these bad habits from time to time, but I clearly recognize that when I choose to prioritize things other than being liked, I am much more effective as a supervisor.
What about you? Ever made these mistakes and suffered the organizational consequences?